Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial compares bimatoprost and tacrolimus efficacy in stable vitiligo, indicating bimatoprost may be preferable for facial lesions.
Background: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune skin disorder characterized by loss of melanocytes, leading to depigmented patches. Though not physically harmful, its appearance causes significant psychological distress, especially in darker-skinned individuals. Topical therapies like tacrolimus, calcineurin inhibitor, are first-line treatment for localized, stable vitiligo. However, bimatoprost, a prostaglandin analog known for its melanogenic properties, is emerging as a potential alternative. The current study was done to compare efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost 0.03% solution versus tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in management of stable vitiligo. Material & Methods: A randomized comparative study was conducted over 24 months in Department of Dermatology at Era’s Lucknow Medical College. Fifty clinically stable vitiligo patients (aged >18 years, <5% BSA involvement) were randomized into two groups: Group A received topical bimatoprost 0.03%, and Group B received topical tacrolimus 0.1%, both applied twice daily over lesions. Treatment was continued for 12 weeks, with follow-up every 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI), Subjective score and Photographic documentation. Any side effects were documented at each follow-up. Results: Both groups showed clinical improvement, with Group A demonstrating faster onset of repigmentation, particularly in facial lesions. Bimatoprost was well-tolerated with minimal side effects such as local hypertrichosis, while tacrolimus was associated with mild burning in some cases. Conclusion: Topical bimatoprost 0.03% is a safe and effective alternative to tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in treating stable vitiligo, especially for cosmetically sensitive areas. Therefore, it can be considered as a treatment option in stable vitiligo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalawat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: