Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Extends admissibility conditions in transformations, emphasizing definability's role for valid outcomes.
This paper extends the admissibility condition of the Modal–Dependence Calculus (MDC) to the domain of structural transformation. A transformation v: x → x′ is admissible if and only if the resultant element satisfies τ(x′) = 1, corresponding to the definability of the dependence relation D*(x′, c). Finite sequences of transformations are admissible if and only if the condition τ(x_i) = 1 holds for all resultant elements. Admissibility is therefore preserved under transformation only when definability is maintained at each step. Any transformation resulting in τ(x′) = 0 yields a non-admissible outcome within the calculus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Austin Jacobs (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: