PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2004Journal of Women s Health153 citations

Gender-Based Differences in the Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcification

View Full Paper
PRPaolo RaggiLSLeslee J. ShawDBDaniel S. Berman

Structured PICO

Does electron beam tomography (EBT) screening for coronary calcification predict all-cause mortality differently in asymptomatic women compared to men?

P
Population
10,377 asymptomatic individuals (40% women) referred by primary care physicians for coronary calcification screening
I
Intervention
Electron beam tomography (EBT) screening for coronary calcification
C
Comparator
Men vs. women across different strata of coronary calcification scores
O
Outcome
All-cause mortalityhard clinical

Coronary calcification screening provides incremental prognostic information over traditional risk factors, with women showing a significantly higher relative risk of death than men at equivalent calcification scores.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of electron beam tomography (EBT) screening to predict all-cause mortality in a large cohort of asymptomatic women and men. METHODS AND RESULTS: We obtained mortality information from the National Death Index in 10377 asymptomatic individuals (40% women) referred by primary care physicians for coronary calcification screening. The average follow-up period was 5 +/- 3.5 years. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were developed to predict all-cause mortality. Women had a lower prevalence of coronary calcification and smaller calcification scores than men (p 1000 (p < 0.0001). Using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses to assess coronary calcification added incremental prognostic value to Framingham risk scores (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of asymptomatic women, coronary calcification screening provided incremental prognostic information after adjustment for traditional risk factors. EBT may be a useful tool for risk stratification in women, where the early diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a strong challenge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raggi et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f9aed7e51e1ba9c6b4b7e0https://doi.org/10.1089/154099904323016437
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper