Why the study?
Current diagnostic criteria use a maximal wall thickness threshold without accounting for ethnicity, sex, and body size, despite Asians having smaller hearts than Caucasians.
Does lowering the recommended maximal wall thickness threshold improve diagnostic sensitivity in Asians with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does lowering the recommended maximal wall thickness threshold improve diagnostic sensitivity in Asians with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Lowering the maximal wall thickness threshold for diagnosing HCM in Asians to 10.0 mm for females and 12.0 mm for males improves diagnostic sensitivity without compromising specificity.
May support adjusted HCM thresholds in Asians; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: ) ≥15.0 mm, without accounting for ethnicity, sex, and body size. It is well-established that Asians have smaller hearts than do Caucasians. Objectives: threshold on the diagnosis of HCM in Asians. Methods: was measured semiautomatically at end-diastole according to the standard 16 myocardial segments. Results: thresholds to 10.0 mm in female patients and 12.0 mm in male patients did not affect specificity (100%) but significantly improved sensitivity (84%). Despite lower left ventricular mass, female patients with HCM demonstrated more features of adverse cardiac remodeling than did male patients: increased myocardial fibrosis, higher asymmetric ratio, and disproportionately worse myocardial strain. Conclusions: to account for ethnicity and sex improves diagnostic sensitivity without compromising specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: