Why the study?
Various ventricular pacing modes are applied for permanent pacemaker implantation, but their effects on spatial dispersion of activation and repolarization times compared to spontaneous rhythm needed characterization.
Do physiological pacing modes (HBP, LBBP, LVSP) preserve activation and repolarization times closer to spontaneous rhythm compared to conventional pacing in patients with narrow QRS?
Do physiological pacing modes (HBP, LBBP, LVSP) preserve activation and repolarization times closer to spontaneous rhythm compared to conventional pacing in patients with narrow QRS?
Physiological pacing modes (HBP, LBBP, LVSP) closely mimic spontaneous ventricular activation and repolarization in patients with narrow QRS.
Physiological pacing may better mimic native conduction in narrow QRS; hypothesis-generating, randomized trials needed before practice change.
Various modes of ventricular pacing are currently applied to patients with an indication for permanent pacemaker implantation. The so-called physiological pacing modes, like His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), stimulate the cardiac conduction system to induce efficient physiological activation. Other techniques, such as left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) and right ventricular septal and apical pacing (RVSP and RVAP), stimulate the ventricular septum or right ventricular apex. 695 ultra-high-frequency electrocardiograms (UHF-ECG)from 176 patients with narrow QRS and pacemaker indication were analyzed to characterize their activation (AT) and repolarization (RT) time. AT and RT were grouped into three regions (R1: leads V1-V2; R2: V3-V4; R3: V5-V6). Overall, selective HBP (sHBP), non-selective LBBP (nsLBBP) and LVSP recordings had the closest AT and RT values to spontaneous rhythm recordings. For AT, the mean R1-R2 and R3-R2 differences with respect to spontaneous rhythm were, in absolute value, below 3, 16 and 10 ms for sHBP, nsLBBP and LVSP, respectively. For RT, the corresponding mean differences were below 11, 34 and 24 ms for sHBP, nsLBBP and LVSP. In conclusion, HBP, LBBP and LVSP render the closest ventricular AT and RT to the spontaneous rhythm in patients with physiological conduction (narrow QRS).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palacios et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: