Why the study?
Endothelial dysfunction is involved across the cardiovascular continuum, making it an important therapeutic target addressed by ACE inhibitors like perindopril through bradykinin and nitric oxide pathways.
This review highlights the mechanistic role of perindopril in improving endothelial function via bradykinin and nitric oxide pathways, supporting its use for hypertension and cardiovascular risk reduction.
May inform ACE inhibitor selection for endothelial dysfunction; leaves open confirmation in outcome trials.
The functional integrity of the endothelium is essential for vascular health. In addition to maintaining a delicate balance between vasodilation and vasoconstriction, the endothelium has numerous other complex roles involved in the maintenance of vascular homeostasis. Chronic exposure to cardiovascular risk factors and oxidative stress results in an imbalance in these functions, creating an environment that favors reduced vasodilation and a proinflammatory and prothrombic state. The involvement of endothelial dysfunction in all stages of the cardiovascular continuum makes it an important target for treatment. One of the major endothelial-derived factors involved in the maintenance of endothelial function is nitric oxide (NO). Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors increase NO production both directly and indirectly by preventing production of angiotensin II (which diminishes NO production) and inhibiting the degradation of bradykinin (which stimulates local release of NO). Among the ACE inhibitors, perindopril appears to have the greatest effects on bradykinin and has demonstrated efficacy in a number of markers of endothelial dysfunction including arterial stiffness and progression of atherosclerosis. There is also strong evidence supporting the use of perindopril-based therapy for the treatment of hypertension and for reducing the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a wide range of patients across the cardiovascular continuum.Funding: The journal's Rapid Service Fee was funded by Servier.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ancion et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: