Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative evaluation reveals chlorhexidine and resin composite impact bond durability in dentin, highlighting treatment implications.
Background: Despite successful immediate dentin bonding, its stability remains challenging due to its susceptibility to protease-induced degradation. Aim: This study aimed to comparatively evaluate microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of resin composite to dentin pretreated using 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 0.05% trans-cinnamaldehyde (TCA), their combination (2% CHX/0.05% TCA) and 50% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) immediately (24 h) and after long-term aging (6 months) under in vitro conditions. Materials and Methods: Superficial dentin was exposed in 75 extracted human molars. Following etching with 37% phosphoric acid, the specimens were randomly allocated ( n = 15) according to the pretreatment agent used. Universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA) was utilized in etch-and-rinse mode and resin composite (4 mm) was built in two increments. From each tooth, dentin-composite beams (1 mm × 1 mm) were sectioned, exposed to tensile load at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to evaluate immediate and long-term μTBS. Data was analyzed statistically by Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( P < 0.05). The failure modes were verified with a stereomicroscope (×40). Results: At 24 h, DMSO showed significantly higher mean μTBS than CHX ( P < 0.05). Following aging, DMSO remained the highest while the mean μTBS of control was significantly lower than CHX and CHX/TCA ( P < 0.05). Intragroup comparisons showed that μTBS decreased over time in control and increased in CHX ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, DMSO pretreatment significantly improved both the immediate and long-term μTBS of composite to dentin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kothari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: