Survey reveals probabilistic survival information boosts kidney acceptance rates in transplant candidates, indicating strong influence on decisions.
Background. Decisions to accept or decline kidney offers hinge on candidates and clinician’s expectations of post-transplant outcomes. Yes, no study has quantified the impact of information provided to candidates on the willingness to accept a kidney for transplantation. Methods. National Kidney Foundation members who were either waitlisted or had received a kidney transplant were surveyed to quantify the impact of probabilistic post-transplant survival information on acceptance of kidneys offered for transplant. Survey participants were randomly assigned to 3 groups with similar proportions of (self-identified) White, Black, and other race people, age distribution, and whether the participant received a transplant or was waitlisted. Each participant group received a different hypothetical kidney offer with different donor quality (12%, 48%, and 85% kidney donor profile index, respectively). Results. Participants’ responses were recorded first with only 1-y post-transplant survival information and subsequently with 5- and 10-y survival probabilities. Participants’ level of confidence in their responses and factors most important to them when making acceptance decisions were also recorded. With 1-y survival information 79%, 73%, and 55% of participants accepted offers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. With additional 5- and 10-y survival information, the acceptance rates increased to 88%, 86%, and 73% for each of the 3 offers ( P < 0.001). Conclusions. Participants frequently identified the likelihood of the kidney surviving 5 and 10 y as being the most important information in choosing their acceptance decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: