In vitro study demonstrates that alexidine shows superior antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis, indicating its potential as an alternative endodontic irrigant.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the time-dependent antimicrobial efficacy of three endodontic irrigants 1% chlorhexidine (CHX), 1% alexidine (ALX), and 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) against Enterococcus faecalis , a common pathogen in persistent root canal infections. Materials and Methods: The microdilution method was used to calculate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the experimental irrigants against E. faecalis . For the time-kill assay (TKA), concentrations were set at double the MIC to ensure effective antimicrobial activity. Standardized inoculum of E. faecalis was exposed to the experimental irrigants (1% CHX, 1% ALX, and 5% NaOCl) and control (bacterial suspensions without any irrigant served as the control) group, and bacterial viability was assessed at 30, 60, 90, and 180 s using serial dilutions to measure log reductions in colony forming unit (CFU) counts. Results: The results of the TKA showed the lowest mean CFU for ALX (2.1 ± 3.28), followed by CHX (7.09 ± 0.030), NaOCl (7.13 ± 0.02), and the control (7.21 ± 0.135). The difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Hence, the authors conclude that ALX showed the highest antimicrobial activity and could serve as a valuable alternative to conventional irrigants, particularly in cases where rapid and effective bacterial eradication is crucial for successful treatment outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnakumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: