PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 7, 2008Clinical Chemistry296 citationsOpen Access

Reference Population and Marathon Runner Sera Assessed by Highly Sensitive Cardiac Troponin T and Commercial Cardiac Troponin T and I Assays

View Full Paper
AMAlma M.A. MingelsLJLeo JacobsEMEtienne Michielsen

Structured PICO

Does the highly sensitive cardiac troponin T assay improve the detection of low-level cardiac troponin concentrations in healthy individuals and marathon runners compared to current commercial assays?

P
Population
546 individuals in a reference population and a cohort of 85 marathon runners
I
Intervention
Precommercial highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay (Roche Diagnostics) and Architect cardiac troponin I (cTnI-Architect) assay (Abbott Diagnostics)
C
Comparator
Current commercial cTnT assay
O
Outcome
Detection of cTn concentrations at low concentrations (<0.01 microg/L) and coefficient of variation <10% at the 99th percentilesurrogate

The highly sensitive cardiac troponin T assay detects elevated troponin levels in significantly more marathon runners post-race compared to standard assays, highlighting its superior limit of detection.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endurance exercise can increase cardiac troponin (cTn) concentrations as high as those seen in cases of minor myocardial infarction. The inability of most cTn assays to reliably quantify cTn at very low concentrations complicates a thorough data analysis, and the clinical implications of such increases remain unclear. The application of recently developed highly sensitive cTn immunoassays may help resolve these problems. METHODS: We evaluated the precommercial highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay from Roche Diagnostics and the Architect cardiac troponin I (cTnI-Architect) assay from Abbott Diagnostics by testing samples from a reference population of 546 individuals and a cohort of 85 marathon runners. We also measured the samples with the current commercial cTnT assay for comparison. RESULTS: Although the hs-cTnT and cTnI-Architect assays were capable of measuring cTn concentrations at low concentrations (<0.01 microg/L), only the hs-cTnT assay demonstrated a CV of <10% at the 99th percentile of the reference population and a near-gaussian distribution of the measurements. After a marathon, 86% of the runners had cTnT concentrations greater than the 99th percentile with the hs-cTnT assay, whereas only 45% of the runners showed increased concentrations with the current cTnT assay. cTn concentrations remained significantly increased the day after the marathon. A multiple regression analysis demonstrated marathon experience and age to be significant predictors of postmarathon cTn concentrations (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The hs-cTnT assay was the only assay tested with a performance capability sufficient to detect cTn concentrations in healthy individuals. The number of runners with increased cTn concentrations after a marathon depends highly on an assay's limit of detection (LOD). The assay with the lowest LOD, the hs-cTnT assay, showed that almost all runners had increased cTn concentrations. The clinical implications of these findings require further investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mingels et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fab3d679c9fe70ce3f568ahttps://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.106427
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper