Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates cognitive and emotional development in children, suggesting feasible integration into schools.
Purpose Children today face increasing cognitive, emotional, and social demands that may undermine their well-being and development. This study evaluated the effects of a school-based intervention combining attentional practices and Philosophy for Children (P4C) dialogue, as promoted by the SEVE Foundation. The program aimed to foster well-being, socio-emotional competencies, and academic self-evaluation. Methodology Using a partial waiting-list control design, the intervention was implemented over 5 or 10 weeks in four Swiss primary school classes ( N = 64, aged 9–11). Children completed validated self-report measures of psychological well-being, prosocial behavior, emotional difficulties, and academic self-evaluation in French, German, Mathematics, and Science at multiple time points. Findings Significant improvements were observed in specific classes. Prosocial behavior increased and socio-emotional difficulties decreased in one class. Academic self-evaluation improved notably in Science and Mathematics, with a marginal trend toward improved peer relationships at the whole-sample level. Over half of the participants reported independently continuing attentional practices after the program. Limitations/implications Although findings support the feasibility and potential benefits of such programs, effects were modest and context-dependent. The lack of randomization limits generalizability, and future studies should assess implementation fidelity, explore optimal duration, and include teacher- or observer-based evaluations. Practical implications These brief, low-cost interventions may be feasibly integrated into school curricula to support inclusive classroom climates, student engagement, and socio-emotional development. Originality/value This study is among the first to evaluate SEVE's dual-component model, offering empirical support for combining P4C and attentional practices in primary education. It provides actionable insight for educators and policymakers seeking to promote student well-being through interdisciplinary approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: