This research demonstrates enhanced antibacterial and antioxidant activity in thymol-loaded pickering emulsions stabilized by whey protein isolate and mung bean protein.
Thymol has been granted “Generally Recognized as Safe” status by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, its application as a natural preservative is constrained by limitations such as poor water solubility and high volatility. In this study, a dual-protein complex was prepared using mung bean protein and whey protein isolate to stabilize thymol-loaded oil-in-water (O/W) Pickering emulsions. The results demonstrated that the dual-protein system was driven by hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, and hydrophobic interactions. Compared to single-protein systems, the dual-protein Pickering emulsions possessed smaller droplet sizes, lower polydispersity indices, and higher surface charges and surface hydrophobicity. Additionally, the dual protein enhanced emulsifying activity, thermal stability, and 30-day storage stability. Notably, the complex formed a continuous three-dimensional porous network structure at the mung bean protein (MBP) to whey protein isolate (WPI) ratio of 50%:50%. Benefiting from this structure and high surface hydrophobicity, the 50%:50% formulation achieved the highest thymol encapsulation efficiency. In terms of functional properties, this optimized emulsion demonstrated notable antibacterial activity and antioxidant activity; it demonstrated antibacterial activity against Shewanella putrefaciens and Staphylococcus aureus. Furthermore, the IC50 value for the 50%:50% formulation was 192.25 ± 1.93 μg/mL (DPPH) and 161.74 ± 0.71 μg/mL (ABTS). In summary, the 50%:50% formulation enhanced the emulsifying activity, encapsulation efficiency, and bioactivity of the emulsion. This system provides an effective strategy for the stabilization and encapsulation of hydrophobic active compounds in emulsions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: