Enviro-Economic Assessment of Vegetation–PV Envelope Retrofits for Nearly Zero Energy Buildings in Hot-Humid Climates

The growing demand for sustainable energy solutions in the built environment has increased interest in hybrid envelope retrofits that integrate vegetation systems with on-site photovoltaics (PVs). This study presents a comparative assessment of two integrated vegetation–PV envelope retrofit strategies for an educational building in a cooling-dominated hot-humid climate relevant to Nearly Zero Energy Building (NZEB) applications. A calibrated dynamic simulation model was developed to quantify annual net electricity savings, operational CO2 emission reductions, and cost-effectiveness using the levelized cost of saved electricity (LCOS). Two configurations were assessed: a solar green roof and a façade system combining green walls with glazing-integrated photovoltaics (GIPVs), enabling a consistent evaluation of roof-based and façade-based hybrid systems under identical conditions. Both strategies deliver comparable energy and environmental performance. The solar green roof achieves annual net electricity savings of 231.0 MWh and avoids 163.3 tCO2, while the green walls–GIPV system provides 228.3 MWh and 161.4 tCO2. However, significant differences are observed in economic performance. The LCOS of the solar green roof is approximately 0.07 $/kWh, compared with 0.28 $/kWh for the façade-integrated system. The results demonstrate that vegetation–PV hybrid retrofits can effectively support NZEB pathways in hot-humid climates, while highlighting that the solar green roof provides a more cost-effective solution under the studied conditions. The study contributes a consistent, decision-oriented comparison of integrated vegetation–PV strategies, linking energy, environmental, and economic performance within a unified modeling framework.