This work uncovers colonialism's influence on Philippine education, indicating it contributes to ongoing coloniality and epistemic paralysis.
In her talk ‘Disappearance, Erasure, and the Void’, Rocío Zambrana (2023) argued against the classification of colonialism as a ‘historical event of the past’. For Zambrana, colonialism is ‘a past that survives in the present’ through the ‘coloniality’ of knowledge and power (2021). Taking Zambrana's cue, I unpack in this work the ways in which coloniality survives in Philippine education and continues to structure Philippine consciousness, social relations, government policies, and political arrangements. In my discussion, I recount how colonial educational institutions in the Philippines, during its Spanish and American occupation, betrayed their respective promise of ‘spiritual salvation’ and ‘self-governance’ to the Philippines. They instead entrenched structures that facilitated political and epistemic subservience to Anglo-European authority, dependence on former imperial economies, and colonial forms of repression and extraction. Through the Philippine example, I develop a concept of (mis)education that is generative of what I call, pernicious epistemic paralysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly Louise Rexzy Pascua Agra (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: