Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prognostic models provide an avenue to predict the risk of individual patients and support shared-decision making. Many prognostic models are published annually, and systematic reviews provide an avenue to collate the existing evidence behind prognostic models to determine whether a model demonstrates adequate predictive performance and is ready for real-world use. This article provides a brief step-by-step guide on how to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies and how these reviews differ from systematic reviews of therapy and diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rayner et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: