Why the study?
Does irbesartan or trandolapril improve endothelial dysfunction and reduce vascular superoxide production in rats with experimental congestive heart failure?
Does irbesartan or trandolapril improve endothelial dysfunction and reduce vascular superoxide production in rats with experimental congestive heart failure?
In a rat model of heart failure, both ACE inhibition and AT1-receptor blockade normalized endothelial vasomotor function and eNOS expression, but only AT1-receptor blockade reduced aortic superoxide formation.
Suggests AT1 blockade may confer added vascular antioxidant benefit over ACE inhibition in experimental HF; hypothesis-generating, requires clinical validation.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction of the vasculature contributes to the elevated peripheral resistance and reduced myocardial perfusion in congestive heart failure (CHF). The present study systematically investigated the effect of angiotensin II (AT(1))- receptor blockade on vascular superoxide (O(2)(-)) production and endothelial dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Vasodilator responses and O(2)(-) production were determined in aortic rings from Wistar rats with experimental CHF 10 weeks after extensive myocardial infarction and compared with sham-operated animals (Sham). Rats were either treated with placebo (P), with the AT(1)-receptor antagonist Irbesartan (50 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) or with the ACE inhibitor Trandolapril (0.3 mg kg(-1) day(-1)). In CHF-P, endothelium-dependent, acetylcholine-induced relaxation was significantly attenuated compared with Sham-P. Chronic treatment with Trandolapril or Irbesartan significantly improved endothelium-dependent relaxation. Aortic O(2)(-) formation was markedly increased in CHF, and was not significantly affected by Trandolapril treatment, while it was reduced by Irbesartan. eNOS expression was reduced in CHF and normalised by both treatments. CONCLUSION: Endothelial vasomotor function in CHF rats was normalised by long-term treatment with an ACE inhibitor or an AT(1)-antagonist. Reduced aortic eNOS expression was normalised by both treatments, whereas aortic superoxide formation was only reduced by the AT(1)-antagonist Irbesartan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schäfer et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: