Why the study?
Does a semiautomated volumetric image analysis program provide reproducible left ventricular measurements compared to manual methods in normal volunteers?
Does a semiautomated volumetric image analysis program provide reproducible left ventricular measurements compared to manual methods in normal volunteers?
A semiautomated volumetric analysis method for breath-hold cine MRI provides reproducible LV measurements in about 5 minutes, comparable to established manual methods.
The reproducibility of a semiautomated method of volumetric analysis allowing estimates of left ventricular (LV) parameters in approximately 5 minutes of analysis time is reported. Twenty normal volunteers underwent cine breath-hold cardiac MRI on two occasions with two observers using this new semiautomated method to estimate LV parameters. Reproducibility of this technique was comparable to published data with a variability of less than approximately 10% for all LV parameters calculated. Using this technique, the 95% confidence limits for change for left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) = +/-15 ml, left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) = +/-8 ml, LV mass = +/-24 g, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = +/-6%. This new method also compared favorably to established manual methods. This new method permits estimation of LV parameters with acceptable reproducibility in a time that may permit routine quantitation of cardiac MR studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butler et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: