Why the study?
The study was conducted to explore sex-based differences in the association between long-term pulse pressure trends and the future risk of incident AF.
Do long-term elevated pulse pressure trajectories increase the risk of incident atrial fibrillation?
Do long-term elevated pulse pressure trajectories increase the risk of incident atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term elevated pulse pressure trajectories are independently associated with an increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation in women, but not in men.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sex-based differences in the association of long-term trends in pulse pressure with future risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been explored using data from the population-based Tromsø Study 1986-2016. METHODS: Women (n = 8331) and men (n = 7638) aged ≥20 years who attended at least two of the three Tromsø Study surveys conducted between 1986 and 2001 (the exposure period) were followed up for incident AF throughout 2016 (the follow-up period). Pulse pressure ≥60 mmHg was considered elevated. Group-based trajectory modelling and Cox regression were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Three long-term trajectory groups for pulse pressure were identified: Group 1 had normal pulse pressure throughout the exposure period, Group 2 had normal pulse pressure at the beginning and elevated pulse pressure at the end of the exposure period, and Group 3 had elevated pulse pressure throughout. Over the follow-up period, 568 (6.8%) women and 798 (10.5%) men developed AF. After adjustment for potential confounders at baseline, the long-term trajectory groups for elevated pulse pressure were associated with increased risk of AF in women, but not in men. In women, the adjusted hazard ratios of AF were 1.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.23, 2.09) for trajectory Group 2 and 2.78 (1.93, 4.02) for trajectory Group 3, compared with Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term elevated pulse pressure trajectories were independently associated with increased risk of AF in women, but not in men. Our findings call for further investigations to understand the mechanisms behind these sex-based differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharashova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: