Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reveals substantial carbon footprint variation across hemodialysis facilities, indicating key targets for reducing medical environmental impact.
BACKGROUND: Greenhouse gas emissions from hemodialysis treatment in the United States have not been quantified. In addition, no previous studies have examined how much emissions vary across facilities, treatments, and emission contributors. We considered emissions from electricity, natural gas, water, and supply use; patient and staff travel distance; and biohazard and landfill waste. The contributors with the largest variation in emissions per treatment were transportation, natural gas, and water (coefficients of variation, 62.5%, 42.4%, and 37.7%, respectively). The annual emissions per hemodialysis facility are equivalent to emissions from the annual energy use in 93 homes; emissions per treatment are equivalent to driving an average automobile for 238 km (149 miles). CONCLUSIONS: Similar medical treatments provided in a single geographic region by facilities that are part of the same organization may be expected to have small variations in the determinants of greenhouse gas emissions. However, we found substantial variation in carbon footprints across facilities, treatments, and emission contributors. Understanding the magnitude and variation in greenhouse gas emissions may help identify measures to reduce the environmental effect of hemodialysis treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sehgal et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: