Randomized trial examines sprint performance in youth baseball players with and without weighted vests, indicating no superior benefits.
PURPOSE: Sprint training is essential to enhance performance in baseball. This study examined the effects of sprint training with and without a weighted vest on 27-m (30-yd) and 55-m (60-yd) linear and 55-m (60-yd) change-of-direction sprint performance in youth baseball players. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, 2-arm parallel group randomized trial with preintervention and postintervention assessments. Thirty-eight male youth baseball players (13.4 [0.5] y) were randomly assigned to a control group or an experimental group (n = 19 each). Both groups completed a 4-week (12-session) sprint training program. The experimental group trained wearing a vest equivalent to 10% of body mass, whereas the control group trained unloaded. RESULTS: No significant group × time interaction was observed for any sprint outcome (27-m: P = .174, r = .22, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.45; 55-m: P = .169, r = .23, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.45; 55-m change of direction: P = .132, r = .25, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.45). However, all participants improved sprint performance following the intervention, with percentage changes of -1.18% to -1.68% for the 27-m sprint (95% CI, -2.83 to -0.10%), -1.00% to -1.18% for the 55-m sprint (95% CI, -1.82 to -0.31%), and -0.94% to -1.08% for the 55-m change-of-direction sprint (95% CI, -1.62 to -0.28%). CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of a 4-week intervention using a weighted-vest equivalent to 10% of body mass, weighted-vest sprint training did not produce superior improvements compared with unloaded sprint training in youth baseball players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Begambre et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: