Key result
Community-based social network intervention improves CV risk scores at 6 months, but benefit fades by 12.
Why the study?
Does a community-based social network intervention improve cardiovascular risk scores in Hispanic and Somali adults?
RCT (n=475)
closed-cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized design
Does a community-based social network intervention improve cardiovascular risk scores in Hispanic and Somali adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.4% vs -0.1%
p-value: p=.03
A community-based social network intervention delivered by lay health promoters resulted in modest, transient improvements in cardiovascular risk and a higher proportion of participants achieving >5% weight loss at 12 months.
Background Immigrants to the United States often face challenges from limited healthcare access and less healthy environments which contribute to rising obesity and cardiovascular risk. Purpose To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a community-based social network intervention for cardiovascular risk reduction among Hispanic and Somali adults. Methods A social network-informed, community-based participatory research-derived health promotion intervention was delivered by Hispanic and Somali lay health promoters (HPs) to members of their social networks over 1 year (12 biweekly sessions in months 0-6; 12 biweekly check-ins in months 7-12). Using a closed-cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized design, social networks were randomly assigned to receive the intervention immediately or after a delay of 1 year. Measurements at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months were derived from 6 of the American Heart Association’s “Life’s Simple 7”: BMI, blood pressure, fasting glucose, cholesterol, physical activity and dietary quality (range 0-12, with higher values indicating lower cardiovascular risk). Waist circumference and proportion of participants who achieved >5% body weight loss were also assessed. Results Four hundred seventy-five participants were enrolled among 51 HPs (29 Hispanic; 22 Somali). There was a statistically significant improvement in cardiovascular risk in the intervention group (n = 246) compared with controls (n = 229) at 6 months (0.4 [1.8] vs. −0.1 [1.7]; P = .03) that was not sustained at 12 months (0.5 [1.9] vs. 0.3 [1.8]; P = .38). There was a statistically significant higher proportion of participants who lost >5% of body weight in the intervention group compared with controls at 12 months (37% [15] vs. 18% [7.9]; P = .02). Reductions in weight and waist circumference in the intervention group compared with controls did not achieve statistical significance. Conclusion A social network intervention, delivered by lay HPs was feasible and resulted in a modest improvement of cardiovascular risk and clinically significant weight loss. Clinical Trial Identification Number NCT05136339.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wieland et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular risk (n=475). Community-based social network intervention vs. Delayed intervention (control) was evaluated on Change in cardiovascular risk score (range 0-12) at 6 months (p=.03). A community-based social network intervention significantly improved cardiovascular risk scores at 6 months compared to controls (0.4 vs -0.1; P=0.03), though this was not sustained at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: