Key result
Infarct volume had a modest, clinically insignificant association with circulating IL-6 levels (ß 0.0084; 95% CI -0.0002 to 0.017) following a non-severe stroke or TIA.
Why the study?
Does infarct volume influence circulating inflammatory marker levels after acute ischemic stroke and TIA?
Cohort (n=365)
Yes
Does infarct volume influence circulating inflammatory marker levels after acute ischemic stroke and TIA?
Effect estimate: ß 0.0084 (95% CI -0.0002 - 0.017)
Infarct volume has a modest, clinically insignificant effect on circulating IL-6 in the days following a non-severe stroke or TIA, suggesting inflammatory markers can be reliably measured for risk stratification around 24 hours post-event.
Background and aims Routine measurement of circulating inflammatory markers after ischemic stroke/TIA identifies patients at risk of recurrence and could guide patient selection for anti-inflammatory therapies for prevention. However, the influence of brain infarction on circulating markers is poorly understood and the optimal timing of measurement for risk prediction is unknown. Methods We performed a prospective multi-centred cohort study which included patients with recent (0-14 days) non-severe ischemic stroke (mRS≤3) or TIA. We measured MCP-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, hsCRP and TNFa and measured infarct volume using manual quantification on DWI sequence. We performed multivariate linear regression to explore the relationship between inflammatory markers and infarct volume after adjustment for confounding factors. Results MRI and inflammatory marker data was available for 365 patients; median infarct volume 0.81cm3 (IQR 0.29 – 3.68cm3) median time to phlebotomy 48hrs (IQR 25-73hrs), 74% non-severe stroke/26% TIA. Following adjustment for age, sex, cholesterol, smoking and atrial fibrillation, infarct volume was modestly associated with IL-6 (ß 0.0084, 95% CI -0.0002 – 0.017) (Figure 1). HsCRP was not associated with infarct volume (ß 0.011, 95% CI -0.0035 – 0.025) (Figure 2). No association was found for the other markers analysed. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that infarct volume has a modest, clinically insignificant effect on circulating IL-6 in the days following a non-severe stroke/TIA, with no effect on the remaining inflammatory markers analysed. These data suggest that inflammatory marker measurement for risk stratification and patient selection for anti-inflammatory prevention strategies should be performed approximately 24hours after stroke. Conflict of interest Jane Buckley: nothing to disclose Figure 1 - belongs to Methods Figure 2 - belongs to Results
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buckley et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in non-severe ischemic stroke or TIA (n=365). Infarct volume was evaluated on circulating IL-6 levels (ß 0.0084, 95% CI -0.0002 - 0.017). Infarct volume had a modest, clinically insignificant association with circulating IL-6 levels (ß 0.0084; 95% CI -0.0002 to 0.017) following a non-severe stroke or TIA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: