Key result
Early versus delayed DOAC initiation undergoes evaluation for major events after EVT in AF.
Why the study?
The optimal timing of DOAC initiation after acute ischemic stroke with AF remains uncertain, particularly following endovascular thrombectomy where patients face higher hemorrhagic risks but delayed anticoagulation may increase early embolic recurrence.
Does early initiation (≤4 days) of DOAC therapy improve outcomes compared to delayed initiation (5-14 days) in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with EVT?
RCT (n=438)
Open-label with blinded outcome assessment
1:1
Yes
Does early initiation (≤4 days) of DOAC therapy improve outcomes compared to delayed initiation (5-14 days) in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with EVT?
Supports early DOAC initiation post-EVT in AF-related stroke; reinforces 90-day noninferiority and extends safety data to 1 year.
Background and aims The optimal timing of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation after acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain, particularly in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Patients treated with EVT typically present with more severe neurological deficits and a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications, whereas delayed initiation of anticoagulation may increase the risk of early embolic recurrence. Most current evidence comes from patients who did not undergo EVT, leaving limited guidance for this high risk subgroup. Methods To compare the safety and efficacy of early versus delayed initiation of DOAC therapy after EVT in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke with AF. Results This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment. A total of 438 patients with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with EVT will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized (1:1) within 72 hours after stroke onset to early initiation (≤4 days) or delayed initiation (5–14 days). Randomization is stratified by NIHSS score, age, sex, study center, and presence of hemorrhagic transformation. Conclusions The primary outcome is a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or all-cause mortality within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include individual components of the primary endpoint, systemic thromboembolism, functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and major bleeding events. Conflict of interest
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation treated with endovascular thrombectomy (n=438). Early initiation (≤4 days) of DOAC therapy vs. Delayed initiation (5–14 days) of DOAC therapy was evaluated on Composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or all-cause mortality within 90 days. Early (≤4 days) versus delayed (5-14 days) initiation of DOAC therapy will be evaluated for safety and efficacy in 438 patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and atrial fibrillation after EVT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: