Key result
TIMERS trial evaluates early versus delayed DOAC initiation after thrombectomy in AF-related stroke.
Why the study?
The optimal timing for DOAC initiation after acute ischaemic stroke in patients with AF remains unclear, particularly after endovascular thrombectomy, as these patients have been under-represented in previous trials.
Does early initiation of DOACs (≤4 days) compared to delayed initiation (5-14 days) reduce the composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, or all-cause death in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with endovascular thrombectomy?
RCT (n=438)
Open-label with blinded outcome assessment
1:1 ratio, centralized, independent web-based, minimization algorithm
Yes
Does early initiation of DOACs (≤4 days) compared to delayed initiation (5-14 days) reduce the composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, or all-cause death in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with endovascular thrombectomy?
The TIMERS trial protocol outlines a randomized study to determine the optimal timing of DOAC initiation after endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation.
Optimal DOAC timing after EVT in AF-related stroke remains undefined; TIMERS will deliver the first RCT data on early versus delayed initiation.
Introduction The optimal timing for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) initiation after acute ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear, particularly in those undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), who are at higher risk of both haemorrhagic transformation and early embolic recurrence. Patients undergoing thrombectomy have been under-represented in previous randomised trials, resulting in limited evidence for guiding management in this high-risk population. The TIMERS trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early versus delayed initiation of DOACs therapy after EVT in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and AF. Methods and analysis This is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label trial with a blinded outcome assessment. In total, 438 patients with acute ischaemic stroke and AF treated with EVT will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio within 72 hours after stroke onset to early initiation (≤4 days) or delayed initiation (5–14 days). The primary outcome is a composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or all-cause death within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include individual components of the primary endpoint, venous thromboembolism, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale), health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)) and major extracranial bleeding events. Ethics and dissemination The study is approved by the Ethics Committee of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, the ethics approval document number is (2025)259-001. The trial findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences. Trial registration number NCT07139301 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation treated with endovascular thrombectomy (n=438). Early initiation of DOACs (≤4 days) vs. Delayed initiation of DOACs (5-14 days) was evaluated on Composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or all-cause death within 90 days. The TIMERS trial is a planned randomized controlled trial that will evaluate whether early (≤4 days) versus delayed (5-14 days) initiation of DOACs improves 90-day outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation after endovascular thrombectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: