PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citations

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a702 Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Acute Carotid Artery Stenting During Endovascular Treatment: Two Fatal Cases

View Full Paper
FRFemke RoelofsAMAnne van der MeijMTMartine Truijman

Key Points

  • To highlight fatal cases of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following acute carotid artery stenting during endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.
  • Reviewed clinical presentation, imaging, treatment, and outcomes of two patients from the CASES trial.
  • For each patient, assessed symptoms and complications post-carotid artery stenting.
  • Patient 1, an 81-year-old woman, developed severe hypertension and intraparenchymal hemorrhage after CAS and died.
  • Patient 2, a 66-year-old woman, experienced progressive hemiparesis and seizures, deteriorating due to a large hemorrhage and subsequently died.

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a rare but severe complication after carotid revascularization.While described in elective procedures, CHS following acute carotid artery stenting (CAS) during endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke has not been reported.We describe two patients in the CASES trial:“Carotid Artery Stenting during Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic Stroke versus deferred treatment of carotid artery stenosis” Methods We reviewed presentation, imaging, treatment, and outcome of two patients treated with immediate CAS during EVT who developed CHS. Results An 81-year-old woman with right internal carotid artery and M1 occlusion (tandem occlusion) underwent EVT with immediate CAS, achieving complete reperfusion.On day three,one day after discharge, she re-presented with severe hypertension, coma, and a right-hemispheric intraparenchymal hemorrhage. She died the next day. A 66-year-old woman with subtotal right internal carotid artery occlusion and M1 occlusion (tandem occlusion) received intravenous thrombolysis followed by EVT with immediate CAS. Four hours later, she developed hypertension, progressive hemiparesis, and generalized seizure.Computer-tomography imaging showed cerebral edema consistent with CHS.After transient improvement, she deteriorated on day 5 due to a large right-hemispheric hemorrhage and died shortly thereafter. Conclusions These two fatal cases suggest that CHS may occur after acute CAS during EVT, a setting in which it has not been previously described.Although causality cannot be proven, the temporal association strongly suggests increased vulnerability to hyperperfusion-related complications.These observations emphasize the need for structured hemodynamic monitoring and indicate the importance of the CASES trial in evaluating the safety of acute CAS during EVT. Conflict of interest Roelofs: nothing to disclose

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roelofs et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f0dbfa21ec5bbf076dehttps://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1381
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper