Key result
The weighted average prevalence of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting is 1.2%, and arterial hypertension is not obligatory for its development.
Why the study?
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome is a serious complication after carotid artery stenting, but its pathophysiological mechanisms in the absence of arterial hypertension remain only partially understood.
What is the prevalence and what are the risk factors for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting?
Systematic Review
What is the prevalence and what are the risk factors for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting?
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome can occur after carotid artery stenting even in the absence of arterial hypertension, highlighting the complex role of impaired cerebral autoregulation and endothelial dysfunction.
CHS can occur without arterial hypertension, including during hypotension; extends risk factor understanding and supports vigilant post-CAS monitoring regardless of BP.
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a serious post-procedural complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The pathophysiological mechanisms of CHS in the absence of arterial hypertension (AH) remain only partially understood. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed database using the terms »cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome«, »hypotension«, »hyperperfusion«, »stroke«, »intracranial hemorrhages«, »risk factors«, »carotid revascularization«, »carotid stenting«, »carotid endarterectomy«, »blood-brain barrier«, »endothelium«, »contrast encephalopathy«, and combinations. We present a case of a normotensive female patient who developed CHS post-CAS for symptomatic carotid stenosis while being hypotensive with complete recovery. We identified 393 papers, among which 65 were deemed relevant to the topic. The weighted average prevalence of CHS after CAS is 1.2% [0.0-37.7%] with that of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) being 0.51% [0-9.3%]. Recently symptomatic carotid stenosis or contralateral carotid revascularization, urgent intervention, acute carotid occlusion, contralateral ≥70% stenosis, and the presence of leptomeningeal collaterals were associated with CHS. A prolonged hemodynamic instability after CAS conveys a higher risk for CHS. However, none of the articles mentioned isolated hypotension as a risk factor for CHS. Whereas mortality after ICH post-CAS ranges from 40 to 75%, in the absence of ICH, CHS generally carries a good prognosis. AH is not obligatory in CHS development. Even though impaired cerebral autoregulation and post-revascularization changes in cerebral hemodynamics seem to play a pivotal role in CHS pathophysiology, our case highlights the complexity of CHS, involving factors like endothelial dysfunction and sudden reperfusion. Further research is needed to refine diagnostic and management approaches for this condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zupan et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome post-carotid artery stenting. Carotid artery stenting was evaluated on Prevalence of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. The weighted average prevalence of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting is 1.2%, and arterial hypertension is not obligatory for its development.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: