Key result
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid intervention is a rare but morbid condition related to increased regional cerebral blood flow secondary to loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation.
Why the study?
What are the pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnostic modalities, and management strategies for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid intervention?
What are the pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnostic modalities, and management strategies for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid intervention?
This review summarizes the pathophysiology, risk factors, and management of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid interventions to help identify at-risk patients and reduce morbidity.
Requires heightened post-procedural monitoring for CHS after stenting; leaves open optimal prevention strategies.
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) after carotid surgery, although rare, is a well-described phenomenon. Although originally described after carotid endarterectomy, it has now also been described after carotid artery stenting. It is classically described as an acute neurologic deficit occurring several days after a carotid procedure, associated with severe hypertension and preceded by a severe headache. CHS represents a spectrum of clinical symptoms ranging from severe unilateral headache, to seizures and focal neurologic defects, to intracerebral hemorrhage in its most severe form. The exact mechanism leading to CHS is unknown; however, it seems to be related to increased regional cerebral blood flow secondary to loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation. Given the significant morbidity associated with CHS, researchers have been trying to identify which patients are most at risk. This is a difficult task given the rarity of the disease and the multiple confounding factors in the patient population who undergo carotid intervention. The goal was to determine those patients most at risk preoperatively, so that they may be more closely monitored postoperatively to prevent the development of CHS and its associated morbidity. The purpose of this review was to summarize the data currently available in the literature on CHS, with emphasis on pathophysiology, risk factor assessment, diagnostic modalities, and disease management, to provide insight for future research to better elucidate how to reduce the morbidity and mortality caused by CHS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lieb et al. (2011) conducted a review in Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Carotid intervention was evaluated. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid intervention is a rare but morbid condition related to increased regional cerebral blood flow secondary to loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: