Key result
App-based home BP telemonitoring with rapid titration reduces clinic SBP ~10 mmHg versus usual care.
Why the study?
Elevated blood pressure increases recurrence risk after ischaemic stroke or TIA and guideline targets are frequently unmet, but few randomised data evaluate home blood pressure telemonitoring after stroke.
Does home blood pressure measurement with telemonitoring and rapid treatment improve mean clinic SBP in patients with recent ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA?
RCT (n=27)
randomly-allocated
Does home blood pressure measurement with telemonitoring and rapid treatment improve mean clinic SBP in patients with recent ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA?
Absolute Event Rate: 129% vs 139%
p-value: p=0.04
An App-based home blood pressure telemonitoring strategy with rapid treatment titration significantly improved systolic blood pressure control at 3 months compared to usual care in patients with recent ischemic stroke or TIA.
Clinicians may consider HBPM-TM/RT post-stroke to improve BP control; leaves open impact on recurrent events pending larger RCTs.[[1]](https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/8-131)[[2]](https://hrbopenresearch.
Background and aims Elevated blood pressure (BP) is associated with an increased risk of recurrence following ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). High rates of failure to achieve current guideline targets (BP <130/80mmHg) are reported. Home blood pressure measurement with telemonitoring (HBPM-TM) is a promising strategy but few randomised data exist after stroke. Methods In a Phase 2b randomised controlled pilot and feasibility trial, we randomly-allocated participants with recent ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA (from 72 hours to 1 year post event) and baseline SBP≥130mmHg. The intervention was HBPM-TM using a dedicated smartphone App, with a rapid (at least weekly) treatment strategy (HBPM-TM/RT), or usual care (office/hospital measures, and/or HBPM to target SBP<130mmHg). The primary outcome was mean clinic SBP at 3 months post-randomisation. Results Of 27 randomised participants, primary outcome data was available for 24 (intervention n=13, usual care n=11, 3 lost to follow-up/withdrew consent). Mean baseline SBP was 150mmHg in both groups. At 3 months, the mean SBP in the HBPM-TM/RT group was 129mmHg (SD 14.7), versus 139mmHg (SD 6.2) in the usual care group (p=0.04). Achievement of SBP guideline targets at 3 months was 62% (8/13) in HBPM-TM/RT patients versus 9% (1/11) in usual care (p=0.01). Serious adverse events were balanced between both groups. Conclusions An App-based HBPM-TM strategy combined with rapid physician-directed medication titration improved control of blood pressure following ischaemic stroke or TIA. Phase 3 randomised trials are required to confirm these findings and to evaluate the impact on recurrent events. Conflict of interest
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Synnott et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (n=27). Home blood pressure measurement with telemonitoring and rapid treatment (HBPM-TM/RT) vs. Usual care was evaluated on mean clinic SBP at 3 months post-randomisation (p=0.04). App-based home blood pressure telemonitoring with rapid treatment titration significantly reduced mean clinic systolic blood pressure at 3 months compared to usual care (129 vs 139 mmHg; p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: