Key result
Home blood pressure telemonitoring will be evaluated against conventional management in a randomized controlled trial to determine its effect on daytime ambulatory blood pressure normalization over 48 weeks in patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome.
Why the study?
Does home blood pressure telemonitoring improve daytime ambulatory blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome?
Population
252 planned adult patients with treated or untreated but uncontrolled essential arterial hypertension and…
Comparison
Home blood pressure telemonitoring with… vs Conventional management with blood pressure…
Design
Other, Blocked randomization procedure, 1:2 ratio, Open label
Follow-up
48 weeks
Authors
Loading...
This study protocol describes a randomized trial to determine if home blood pressure telemonitoring improves blood pressure control and adherence in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome compared to conventional office-based management.
RCT (n=252)
Open-label
Blocked randomization (1:2 ratio)
Yes
Does home blood pressure telemonitoring improve daytime ambulatory blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome?
This study protocol describes a randomized trial to determine if home blood pressure telemonitoring improves blood pressure control and adherence in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome compared to conventional office-based management.
Parati et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Essential arterial hypertension and metabolic syndrome (n=252). Home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPT) vs. Conventional management (CM) was evaluated on Rate of subjects achieving normal daytime ambulatory blood pressure targets (<135/85 mmHg) 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization. Home blood pressure telemonitoring will be evaluated against conventional management in a randomized controlled trial to determine its effect on daytime ambulatory blood pressure normalization over 48 weeks in patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: