Qualitative study explores personal growth and coping in undergraduate wellness courses, suggesting curriculum-integrated strategies support well-being.
Background Undergraduate students, including those preparing for health professions, report high rates of psychological distress and underuse of traditional counseling services. Credit-bearing wellness courses that combine psychoeducation with experiential learning may offer a scalable, curriculum-based approach to supporting student well-being. Objective This qualitative study explored how undergraduate students described personal growth, coping, and lifestyle changes following participation in experiential wellness courses. Methods An anonymous postcourse online survey captured open-ended responses from students enrolled across 6 wellness course sections. The courses emphasized stress physiology, evidence-based coping strategies, and weekly experiential assignments. Narrative responses from 110 participants were analyzed inductively using the reflexive thematic analysis developed by Braun and Clarke within a constructivist-interpretivist paradigm. Results A total of six themes were identified: (1) healthy habits and practical lifestyle change; (2) stress management skills and mental health techniques; (3) self-reflection, awareness, and personal growth; (4) relevance and immediate applicability; (5) peer connection and discussion-based learning; and (6) course structure and opportunities for improvement. Students described adopting new coping strategies, developing greater self-awareness, and perceiving course content as relevant and applicable to their daily lives. Conclusions Students described experiential wellness courses as supportive of coping, self-awareness, and behavior change. These findings provide insight into how students engage with and interpret course-based wellness education. Curriculum-integrated approaches may represent a complementary strategy to support student well-being. Future research should examine these approaches across diverse populations and over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: