Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 8, 2026International Studies Quarterly

Competing State Interests and the Strategic Use of Advisory Proceedings: Written Submissions in the ICJ Climate Case

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SPSomin ParkYonsei UniversityYKYewon Kwon

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Examines state strategies in ICJ climate advisory proceedings, suggesting implications for global governance.

Key Points

  • The study investigates how states utilize written submissions in ICJ advisory proceedings to advance national interests.
  • Analyzed a novel dataset from ICJ climate change advisory proceedings.
  • Conducted close examinations of individual written submissions.
  • Assessed the motivations behind legal engagement in non-binding processes.
  • Evidence shows that state participation is influenced by strategic interests.
  • States present competing visions of international obligations related to climate change.
  • Strategic use of written statements reveals intersections of law and international politics.

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fa1bfa21ec5bbf081a1https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag022
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Participation of Non-State Actors in ICJ Proceedings2012 · 7 citations
  2. 2International Advisory Proceedings on Climate Change2023 · 19 citations
  3. 3Are European Court of Justice judges biased towards their member states?2025 · 6 citations