Randomized trial evaluates P21/MCM-2 as a biomarker for relapse in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, indicating treatment outcomes.
Current clinical tools for predicting relapse and guiding adjuvant therapy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) lack precision, especially in intermediate-risk disease. This study evaluated whether a non-proliferative tumour cell phenotype, P21 (CDKN1A inhibitor) positive and MCM2 (DNA replication protein) negative (P21⁺/MCM2⁻), could serve as a robust biomarker to improve prognostic stratification and guide post-nephrectomy treatment decisions. We used multiplex immunofluorescence and AI-based image analysis on nephrectomy specimens from three independent ccRCC cohorts: UK arm of the SORCE trial (n=382), Korean (n=71), and Scottish (n=88). An optimal 2% cut-off for P21⁺/MCM2⁻ cells was determined using X-tile software. Additional analyses assessed endoglin/CD105 co-expression, paired primary-metastatic samples (n=41), and associations with adjuvant sorafenib therapy. In two intermediate-risk ccRCC cohorts (SORCE, n=63; Korean, n=71), patients with >2% P21⁺/MCM2⁻ cells had significantly longer time to relapse (HR=0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.54; HR=0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.72). Prognostic value was confirmed in high-risk (SORCE, HR=0.43, 95% CI: 0.19-0.99) and all-risk (Scottish, HR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.98) cohorts. Notably, patients with high P21⁺/MCM2⁻ levels on placebo fared better than those receiving adjuvant TKI therapy (HR=0.29, 95% CI: 0.16-0.50). In 41 paired samples, 85% showed higher P21⁺/MCM2⁻ abundance in metastases than in primary tumours. As a conclusion, P21⁺/MCM2⁻ cell count is a robust biomarker that refines relapse risk stratification in ccRCC and identifies patients who may not benefit from adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. High levels of these non-proliferative, senescent-like cells suggest tumour dormancy and a more favourable outcome without treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdullah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: