PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a321 Cryptogenic Stroke in Women: Impact of Insertable Cardiac Monitoring in the Strokewise Cohort Study

View Full Paper
JKJannicke Koldéus-FalchASAntje SundsethBTBente Thommessen

Key Result

Insertable cardiac monitors significantly increased atrial fibrillation detection compared to standard follow-up (36% vs 9%; OR 6.9; 95% CI 3.7-13.5; p<0.001) but did not reduce recurrent stroke.

Key Points

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of insertable cardiac monitors in detecting atrial fibrillation and improving outcomes after cryptogenic stroke in women.
  • Recruited women with cryptogenic stroke from two university hospitals (2016–2023).
  • Implemented insertable cardiac monitors in one center and standard follow-up in another.
  • Analyzed outcomes using logistic regression and Cox models adjusted for vascular risk factors.
  • AF detected in 36% of ICM recipients vs 9% in controls (OR 6.9; 95% CI 3.7–13.5; p < 0.001).
  • Lower 2-year mortality with ICM (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16–0.94; p = 0.036).
  • Fewer major bleeding events in ICM group (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.06–0.52; p = 0.002).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=475)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does insertable cardiac monitoring improve atrial fibrillation detection and reduce recurrent stroke in women with cryptogenic stroke?

P
Population
475 women with cryptogenic stroke, mean age 73±12 years, recruited from two university hospitals (2016–2023).
I
Intervention
Insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) (n=262)
C
Comparator
Standard non-invasive follow-up
O
Outcome
Atrial fibrillation (AF) detection and recurrent stroke at 1 and 2 yearshard clinical

In women with cryptogenic stroke, insertable cardiac monitors significantly increased atrial fibrillation detection compared to standard follow-up, but did not significantly reduce recurrent stroke.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 6.9 (95% CI 3.7-13.5)

Absolute Event Rate: 36% vs 9%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims The clinical value of insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) and guiding anticoagulation after cryptogenic stroke in women remains uncertain. We evaluated associations between ICM and AF detection, recurrent stroke, mortality, and major bleeding. Methods We recruited women with cryptogenic stroke from two university hospitals (2016–2023). Patients received ICM in one centre, while standard non-invasive follow-up in the other. Primary outcomes were AF detection and recurrent stroke at 1 and 2 years. Secondary outcomes included mortality, combined stroke/death, cardiovascular events, oral anticoagulation, and major bleeding. Analyses used logistic regression and Cox models adjusted for prespecified vascular risk factors. Results Among 475 women (mean age 73±12 years; ICM n = 262), AF was detected in 36% (ICM) vs 9% (controls) (OR 6.9; 95% CI 3.7–13.5; p 0.001). Time-to-event analyses showed no significant differences in recurrent stroke (HR 1.8; 95% CI 0.78–4.36; p = 0.17), mortality (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.58–1.58; p = 0.88) or the composite outcome (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.60–1.50; p = 0.85). However, fixed-time analyses indicated lower 2-year mortality with ICM (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16–0.94; p = 0.036) and fewer major bleeding events (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.06–0.52; p = 0.002). Age and troponinT independently predicted adverse outcomes. Conclusions ICM increased AF detection and enabled safe anticoagulation, with possible reductions in mortality and bleeding but no clear effect on recurrent stroke.These findings support its potential role in secondary prevention in women with cryptogenic stroke. Conflict of interest Jannicke Koldéus-Falch, nothing to disclose.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koldéus-Falch et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cryptogenic stroke (n=475). Insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) vs. Standard non-invasive follow-up was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation detection (OR 6.9, 95% CI 3.7-13.5, p=<0.001). Insertable cardiac monitors significantly increased atrial fibrillation detection compared to standard follow-up (36% vs 9%; OR 6.9; 95% CI 3.7-13.5; p<0.001) but did not reduce recurrent stroke.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd8021bfa21ec5bbf0892bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.250
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper