Key result
ICM-detected AF after cryptogenic stroke is linked to ~76% higher recurrent stroke risk.
Why the study?
ICMs are often implanted after cryptogenic stroke to detect AF and guide anticoagulation, but the impact of this practice on stroke recurrence remains unclear.
Does insertable cardiac monitor-detected atrial fibrillation increase the risk of recurrent stroke/TIA in patients with cryptogenic stroke?
Cohort (n=840)
No
Does insertable cardiac monitor-detected atrial fibrillation increase the risk of recurrent stroke/TIA in patients with cryptogenic stroke?
Hazard Ratio: 1.76 (95% CI 1.07–2.89)
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 13%
p-value: p=0.026
While ICM-detected atrial fibrillation increases the hazard of recurrent stroke, the vast majority of stroke recurrences in this population occur in patients without detected AF, suggesting non-AF etiologies are primarily responsible.
Most recurrent strokes after cryptogenic stroke occurred without detected AF, especially in younger low-risk patients; leaves open AF causality and anticoagulation benefit.
BACKGROUND: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are often implanted after cryptogenic stroke (CS) to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) and guide anticoagulation. However, the impact of this practice on stroke recurrence remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare stroke recurrence between CS patients with and without ICM-detected AF and identify predictors of recurrent stroke. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive patients admitted to a stroke center with no history of AF who received an ICM for CS or transient ischemic attack. RESULTS: -VASc score <4 and age of <65 years (n = 107), only 1 patient with a recurrent stroke had AF detected (<1%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high rate of detection of AF following CS by ICMs, most strokes occurring in this population may not be due to AF. Further randomized trials are needed to verify these observations and clarify the benefit of routine ICM implantation for secondary CS prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bharucha et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=840). Insertable cardiac monitor-detected atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation detected by insertable cardiac monitor was evaluated on Recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.07-2.89, p=0.026). Insertable cardiac monitor-detected atrial fibrillation following cryptogenic stroke was associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke (HR 1.76) when accounting for immortal time bias, though 70.5% of recurrent strokes occurred in patients without detected atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: