Why the study?
Does the presence of coronary collateral vessels reduce infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction who fail to reperfuse after thrombolytic therapy?
Population
125 patients with acute myocardial infarction from the TIMI Phase I trial who failed to recanalize at 90…
Comparison
Presence of angiographically documented coronary… vs Absence of coronary collateral vessels (n=74)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
hospital discharge
Authors
Loading...
May refine prognosis after failed thrombolysis; hypothesis-generating for collateral-targeted strategies in AMI.
Does the presence of coronary collateral vessels reduce infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction who fail to reperfuse after thrombolytic therapy?
In patients with acute myocardial infarction who fail to reperfuse after thrombolytic therapy, the presence of coronary collaterals is associated with smaller infarct size and better preserved left ventricular function.
Habib et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: