Qualitative study explores the intersectional impact of sexual harassment on women students with disabilities, implying institutional responsibility is crucial.
This study explores the intersectional forms of oppression that drive the sexual harassment of women students with disabilities in Ethiopian universities based on narrative interviews with twelve participants. Its findings reveal a range of sexual-harassment practices, including verbal and nonverbal conduct such as unwanted jokes, physical contact, sex requests for support, and rape attempts. The intersection of structural drivers with poverty, disability, gender, and problematic attitudes causes intersectional vulnerability. The participant women highlight hesitance to report harassment due to stigma, lack of support, distrust of peers and staff, and fears of losing crucial assistance. Consequently, they find themselves between academic survival and safety, which significantly influences their coping strategies. The present article argues that this double bind illustrates the need to shift the focus toward institutional responsibilities and commitments in addressing intersectional marginalization and fostering inclusive environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tizita Kassahun Gebremariam (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: