PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Social Impact in Business Research0 citations

The role of governance in augmenting the adaptive capacity of a business school to create social impact

View Full Paper
NWNicole (Nicki) WraggSwinburne University of TechnologyCPChamila PereraSwinburne University of TechnologySCShana ChongSwinburne University of Technology

Key Points

  • This study aims to describe a governance structure that effectively organizes and measures social impact within a business school context.
  • Utilized participatory systemic inquiry to analyze complex social systems.
  • Developed a narrative case study reflecting key milestones of governance structure evolution.
  • Engaged a representative group of participants in the collaborative process.
  • Evaluation of grassroots activities directed the School's strategy and improved adaptive capacity.
  • Top-down and bottom-up governance developments were integrated to enhance resource utilization.
  • Introduced a framework for business schools to embed social impact through governance and participatory practices.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe an emerging governance structure that organises research, thought leadership, learning and teaching, community and extracurricular activities and activates, inspires, evaluates and measures the social impact of the staff, students and partners of Swinburne University of Technology’s School of Business, Law and Entrepreneurship (the School). Design/methodology/approach Participatory systemic inquiry (PSI) is a collaborative process designed to map and analyse complex social systems. In this study, it informed the development of a narrative case study that examined the key milestones of evolving governance structure as reflected by a representative group of participants in the process. Findings Evaluation of grassroots-level activities informed the School’s direction and how top-down and bottom-up developments intersected to augment the adaptive capacity of people and resources, thereby enhancing the School’s social impact. Originality/value This study combines narrative case study with participatory systemic inquiry to show how governance structures overcome fragmented efforts and connect adaptive interventions, empowerment and capacity building. It also introduces an approach that moves beyond traditional theories by emphasising non-linear change, resilience and inclusive participation, explaining how grassroots initiatives evolve into institutional capacity and governance. These insights inform the development of Advancing Social Impact in Business Schools: A Practical Guide for Deans, which is presented in this paper, and which outlines how business schools can embed social impact through governance, stakeholder engagement, systemic mapping, adaptive practices and iterative learning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wragg et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0e2b9154b0b828780edhttps://doi.org/10.1108/jsibr-08-2025-0104
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The role of universities in accelerating the sustainable development goals in Europe2024 · 92 citations
  2. 2Case Study and Narrative Inquiry as Merged Methodologies: A Critical Narrative Perspective2020 · 101 citations
  3. 3The impact of business schools in transforming the society case: AUC School of Business2019 · 9 citations
  4. 4Towards an integrative definition of scaling social impact in social enterprises2020 · 77 citations
  5. 5The state of SDGs and sustainability practices of public sector entities: Evidence from under-investigated context2024 · 15 citations