Review integrates engineering framework for repurposing gas storage, indicating pathways for sustainable energy solutions.
Underground Gas Storage (UGS) is transitioning from traditional fossil fuel peak-shaving facilities into comprehensive hubs for Terawatt-hour-scale Terawatt-hour (TWh) scale renewable energy storage. The unique physicochemical properties of diverse fluids, such as the negative Joule–Thomson coefficient of hydrogen (−0.03 K/bar), present complex engineering adaptability challenges. Since existing studies primarily focus on single mechanisms or specific geological types, this review integrates a unified engineering framework to evaluate the repurposing potential and retrofitting requirements of existing oil and gas assets. By compiling a property benchmarking matrix for methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen, the storage adaptability of various geological formations is summarized. Salt caverns exhibit strong adaptability to highly diffusive and reactive fluids due to their high salinity (exceeding 150 g/L) and mechanical stability, whereas porous media offer massive capacity (more than 10 times) but require overcoming severe biogeochemical obstacles. Based on thermo–hydro–mechanical–chemical–biological (THMCB) coupling mechanisms, an integrity evaluation system for artificial wellbore and natural geological barriers is systematically reviewed. Critical risks, including fatigue failure under high-frequency cyclic loading, material degradation, gas leakage, and indirect Global Warming Potential (GWP), are elucidated. A future evolution route integrating physical, digital, and policy dimensions is outlined. This roadmap emphasizes Hydrogen-Enriched Compressed Natural Gas (HCNG)synergistic storage, dynamic risk control utilizing digital twins and Artificial Intelligence (AI), and standardized Life Cycle Assessment mechanisms (LCA), providing a scientific basis for the sustainable transition of UGS facilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: