Comparative analysis shows listed companies have higher transparency levels than non-listed firms, highlighting the need for improvement.
The transparency of economic and financial information constitutes an essential condition for supporting stakeholders’ decision-making processes. However, transparency may also be perceived as a risk to a company’s image, particularly when disclosed information is unfavorable. Consequently, corporate attitudes toward transparency remain heterogeneous and extend beyond the mere availability of information to include its reliability and accuracy. This study proposes a comparative analysis of the level of transparency between listed and non-listed companies, based on a sample of 78 firms listed on the Casablanca Stock Exchange. The findings indicate that listed companies exhibit a higher level of transparency compared to non-listed firms. Nevertheless, this level remains insufficient to fully meet stakeholders’ informational needs. This research contributes to a better understanding of financial commu- nication practices in Morocco and highlights the importance of improving transparency in order to strengthen investor confidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saadouni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: