This guide proposes intersectionality-based supervision to enhance equity and responsiveness in mental health training.
Clinical supervision is central to clinical training. Yet, traditional supervision models often overlook the interplay of power, identity, and systemic influence. While many supervision frameworks exist, few offer guidance on applying intersectional principles in practice. This paper addresses that gap by proposing the use of the Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework to guide clinical supervision. Practical examples of IBPA-informed supervision are provided, along with implications for training, evaluation, and reflective practice. This model seeks to foster more responsive, equity-informed supervisory relationships across diverse clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katafiasz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: