Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) has been proposed as a mediator of perioperative myocardial ischemia, vasoconstriction, and thrombosis. As these adverse events are minimized with epidural anesthesia, rather than general anesthesia, we hypothesized that local anesthetics would inhibit TXA(2)-receptor signaling. We used fluorometric determination of intracellular [Ca(2+)] in human K562 cells and 2-electrode voltage clamp measurements in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing TXA(2) receptors. After 10-min incubation, lidocaine (IC(50): 1.02 +/- 0.2 x 10(-3) M), ropivacaine (IC(50): ropivacaine 6.3 +/- 0.9 x 10(-5) M), or bupivacaine (IC(50): 1.42 +/- 0.08 x 10(-7) M) inhibited TXA(2)-induced [Ca(2+)](i) in K562 cells. These data were confirmed in Xenopus oocytes recombinantly expressing TXA(2) receptors, with IC(50)s of bupivacaine 1.2 +/- 0.2 x 10(-5) M, R(+) ropivacaine 4.9 +/- 1.7 x 10(-4) M, S(-) ropivacaine 5.3 +/- 0.9 x 10(-5) M, and lidocaine 6.4 +/- 2.8 x 10(-4) M. Intracellular pathways activated by IP(3) and GTPgammaS were not significantly affected by the local anesthetics tested. QX314, a positively charged lidocaine analog, inhibited only if injected intracellularly (IC(50): 5.3 +/- 1.7 x 10(-4) M), indicating one local anesthetic target is most likely inside the cell. Benzocaine (largely uncharged) inhibited with an IC(50) of 8.7 +/- 1.8 x 10(-4) M. This suggests that some of the beneficial effects of regional anesthesia techniques might be due to direct interaction of local anesthetics with the functioning of membrane proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hönemann et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: