This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Four low‐spin {FeNO} 6 complexes, [Fe(NO)(PS2)(PS2H)] ( 1 , PS2H 2 = bis(2‐dimercaptophenyl)phenylphosphine) with a pendant thiol, [Fe(NO)(PS2)(PS2CH 3 )] ( 2 ) bearing a pendant thioether, and [Fe(NO)(PS2)( R PS)] (RH, 4a ; RTMS, 4b ) without the noncovalent thiol/thioether group are spectroscopically and structurally characterized. In comparisons of the ν NO , absorption energy in UV/vis spectra and structural parameters from single X‐ray diffraction studies, the four iron‐nitrosyl‐thiolato compounds share similarity in electronic structure. Complex 1 with a pendant thiol leads to NO and HNO production upon exposure to the light. Photolysis of 2 bearing a pendant thioether only affords NO. Effective detection of HNO or NO from 1 or 2 is achieved by the employment of [Mn III ( TMS PS3)(DABCO)]. In contrast, 4a and 4b show inertness toward visible‐light stimulus. Photolysis and having pendant thiol/thioether group play key roles in NO production from these iron‐nitrosyl‐thiolato complexes, that is, the Fe‐NO bond is weakened by exposure to light and the noncovalent SH of 1 or SCH 3 of 2 can serve as an incoming ligand to interact with Fe atom, resulting in a transient with intramolecular [RS⋅⋅⋅Fe⋅⋅⋅NO] interaction (RH and CH 3 ) which could facilitate NO dissociation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: