Control of Salmonella and Pathogenic E. coli Contamination of Animal Feed Using Alternatives to Formaldehyde-Based Treatments

Rebecca J. Gosling; I. Mawhinney; Kurt E. Richardson; Andrew Wales; Rob Davies

doi:10.3390/microorganisms9020263

January 27, 2021MicroorganismsOpen Access

Control of Salmonella and Pathogenic E. coli Contamination of Animal Feed Using Alternatives to Formaldehyde-Based Treatments

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

To evaluate the efficacy of non-formaldehyde chemical alternatives for controlling Salmonella and pathogenic Escherichia coli contamination in animal feed.
Assessed alternative antimicrobial products across multiple concentrations against bacterial contamination in animal feed.
Conducted comparative evaluations to determine bacterial eradication rates across treatment conditions.
Only product A applied at the highest concentration appeared to achieve complete elimination of the target pathogen.
Statistical comparisons for the target organism were limited in scope due to data constraints.

Implication

Experimental study reveals pathogen eradication in animal feed using an alternative antimicrobial at high concentration, highlighting potential non-formaldehyde decontamination options.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Gosling et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff91a46018b8d0892d8af6 https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020263

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Control of Salmonella and Pathogenic E. coli Contamination of Animal Feed Using Alternatives to Formaldehyde-Based Treatments

Key Points

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Control of Salmonella and Pathogenic E. coli Contamination of Animal Feed Using Alternatives to Formaldehyde-Based Treatments

Key Points

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading