Why the study?
Does resumption of anticoagulation reduce thromboembolic events and affect ICH recurrence in adults with anticoagulation-associated ICH?
Does resumption of anticoagulation reduce thromboembolic events and affect ICH recurrence in adults with anticoagulation-associated ICH?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Restarting anticoagulation after an intracranial hemorrhage appears to lower thromboembolic risk without significantly increasing the risk of recurrent hemorrhage in observational data.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of restarting anticoagulation therapy after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the associations of anticoagulation resumption with the subsequent risk of ICH recurrence and thromboembolism. METHODS: We searched published medical literature to identify cohort studies involving adults with anticoagulation-associated ICH. Our predictor variable was resumption of anticoagulation. Outcome measures were thromboembolic events (stroke and myocardial infarction) and recurrence of ICH. After assessing study heterogeneity and publication bias, we performed a meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the strength of association between anticoagulation resumption and our outcomes. RESULTS: for heterogeneity <0.001). No significant publication bias was detected in our analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In observational studies, reinstitution of anticoagulation after ICH was associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic complications and a similar risk of ICH recurrence. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the true risk-benefit profile of anticoagulation resumption after ICH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murthy et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: