Key result
Fulminant myocarditis is linked to a ~15-fold increase in 60-day cardiac death or transplantation.
Why the study?
Disagreement exists regarding outcomes of fulminant myocarditis compared with acute nonfulminant myocarditis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Does fulminant myocarditis increase the risk of cardiac death or heart transplantation compared to nonfulminant myocarditis in patients with acute myocarditis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Cohort (n=220)
Yes
Does fulminant myocarditis increase the risk of cardiac death or heart transplantation compared to nonfulminant myocarditis in patients with acute myocarditis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Absolute Event Rate: 28% vs 1.8%
p-value: p=0.0001
Fulminant myocarditis is associated with significantly higher short- and long-term rates of cardiac death and heart transplantation compared to nonfulminant myocarditis, with histologic subtype providing additional prognostic value.
BACKGROUND: Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a form of acute myocarditis characterized by severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction requiring inotropes and/or mechanical circulatory support. A single-center study found that a patient with FM had better outcomes than those with acute nonfulminant myocarditis (NFM) presenting with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, but otherwise hemodynamically stable. This was recently challenged, so disagreement still exists. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to provide additional evidence on the outcome of FM and to ascertain whether patient stratification based on the main histologic subtypes can provide additional prognostic information. METHODS: A total of 220 patients (median age 42 years, 46.3% female) with histologically proven acute myocarditis (onset of symptoms <30 days) all presenting with left ventricular systolic dysfunction were included in a retrospective, international registry comprising 16 tertiary hospitals in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The main endpoint was the occurrence of cardiac death or heart transplantation within 60 days from admission and at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Patients with FM (n = 165) had significantly higher rates of cardiac death and heart transplantation compared with those with NFM (n = 55), both at 60 days (28.0% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.0001) and at 7-year follow-up (47.7% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.0001). Using Cox multivariate analysis, the histologic subtype emerged as a further variable affecting the outcome in FM patients, with giant cell myocarditis having a significantly worse prognosis compared with eosinophilic and lymphocytic myocarditis. In a subanalysis including only adults with lymphocytic myocarditis, the main endpoints occurred more frequently in FM compared with in NFM both at 60 days (19.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.005) and at 7-year follow up (41.4% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: This international registry confirms that patients with FM have higher rates of cardiac death and heart transplantation both in the short- and long-term compared with patients with NFM. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the histologic subtype of FM carries independent prognostic value, highlighting the need for timely endomyocardial biopsy in this condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ammirati et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Acute myocarditis with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=220). Fulminant myocarditis vs. Nonfulminant myocarditis was evaluated on Occurrence of cardiac death or heart transplantation within 60 days from admission and at long-term follow-up (p=0.0001). Fulminant myocarditis was associated with significantly higher rates of cardiac death or heart transplantation compared with nonfulminant myocarditis at 60 days (28.0% vs 1.8%, p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: