Why the study?
What are the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical implications of conduction disturbances after TAVI?
What are the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical implications of conduction disturbances after TAVI?
This review highlights that new-onset conduction blocks remain the most common complication after TAVI, emphasizing the need for new strategies to avoid them as TAVI expands to low-risk patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conduction risks warrant caution as TAVI expands to low-risk patients; leaves open targeted prevention strategies.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a worldwide accepted alternative for treating patients at intermediate or high risk for surgery. In recent years, the rate of complications has markedly decreased except for new-onset atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction block that remains the most common complication after TAVI. Although procedural, clinical, and electrocardiographic predisposing factors have been identified as predictors of conduction disturbances, new strategies are needed to avoid such complications, particularly in the current TAVI era that is moving quickly toward the percutaneous treatment of low-risk patients. In this article, we will review the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical implications of conduction disturbances after TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangieri et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: