Analytical cross-sectional study evaluates adropin as a biomarker in diabetic nephropathy, indicating its potential role in risk assessment.
Background: Diabetic nephropathy is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease worldwide. Conventional markers such as serum creatinine and urine albumin–creatinine ratio (ACR) have limitations in early detection. Adropin, a novel peptide hormone involved in metabolic regulation and endothelial function, has emerged as a potential biomarker in metabolic disorders. Objectives: To evaluate serum adropin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with and without nephropathy and to assess its association with renal function and metabolic parameters. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 90 T2DM patients, divided into Group A (with nephropathy, n=45) and Group B (without nephropathy, n=45). Clinical parameters, glycaemic indices, lipid profile, renal function tests, and serum adropin levels (ELISA) were measured. Statistical analysis included independent t-test, Pearson’s correlation, multiple regression, logistic regression, and ROC curve analysis. Results: Patients with nephropathy had significantly higher BMI, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, HbA1C, and ACR, along with lower eGFR compared to those without nephropathy (p<0.05). Serum adropin levels were significantly reduced in Group A (89.9+55.2 vs 127.5+51.9 in Groip B) Adropin showed a negative correlation with BMI, glycaemic parameters, and ACR, and a positive correlation with eGFR and HDL cholesterol. Logistic regression identified adropin as an independent predictor of nephropathy. ROC analysis demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy (AUC=0.701), with an optimal cut-off of 80 ng/L (sensitivity 75%, specificity 72%). Conclusion: Serum adropin levels are significantly reduced in diabetic nephropathy and correlate with renal dysfunction. Adropin may serve as a promising adjunct biomarker for early detection and risk stratification of diabetic nephropathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priyadharsini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: