Key result
Quartile and max-min metrics yield up to ~8x larger HR changes during OSA than the mean.
Why the study?
Although OSA-induced heart rate changes are widely studied as noninvasive biomarkers, the lack of standardized analysis methods has led to inconsistent findings, requiring evaluation of how analysis choices affect observed changes.
How do different statistical analysis choices influence the observed heart rate changes induced by obstructive sleep apnea?
Population
2,035 participants with validated OSA annotations in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Sleep Ancillary Study
Comparison
Different HR metrics, analysis window durations, OSA segmentations, and OSA episode definitions
Design
Cross-sectional analysis of polysomnography data
Authors
Loading...
Warrants caution with mean HR metrics in OSA; leaves open optimal method for quantifying autonomic responses and CV risk.
Observational (n=2,035)
How do different statistical analysis choices influence the observed heart rate changes induced by obstructive sleep apnea?
Statistical analysis choices, such as HR metrics and window durations, significantly influence the quantification of OSA-induced heart rate changes, highlighting the need for standardized methodologies.
Zhou et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (n=2,035). Various statistical analysis methods (metrics, window durations, segmentations) was evaluated on ECG-derived heart rate (HR) changes in pre-, intra-, and post-OSA events. Statistical analysis choices significantly influenced observed heart rate changes during obstructive sleep apnea, with quartile and max-min metrics producing 5 to 8 times larger changes than the mean.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: