PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2002Clinical Rehabilitation137 citations

Co-morbidity adjustment for functional outcomes in community-dwelling older adults

View Full Paper
SRSally K. RiglerSSStephanie A. StudenskiDWDennis Wallace

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize relationships between self-reported co-morbidity and functional outcomes in community-dwelling older adults, and to assess whether the impact of co-morbidity persists even after adjustment for baseline functional status. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. We examined associations between self-reported co-morbidity at baseline and functional outcomes at one year, with and without adjustment for baseline functional status. SETTING: Outpatient clinics at a managed care and a Veterans Affairs site. SUBJECTS: Four hundred and fifty-seven community-dwelling older adults representing a broad spectrum of overall health status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (a) New basic ADL (activities of daily living) problem during follow-up; (b) 10-point decline in the physical function index of the MOS-36 (MOS-PFI). RESULTS: Co-morbidity was associated with adverse functional outcomes in bivariable analyses. After adjustment for age and baseline functional status, an accumulated co-morbidity score provided additional explanatory power for predicting new ADL problems; odds ratios were 2.30 (1.09, 5.09) and 2.96 (1.48, 6.25) for 2 and > or = 3 affected co-morbidity domains, respectively. The impact of baseline status was also important; odds ratios for new ADL problems were 4.77 (2.68, 8.81) when at least one instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) problem was present at baseline, and 15.6 (8.05, 31.3) when at least one basic ADL problem was present at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Accumulated self-reported co-morbidity has significant negative effects on function at one year; these effects are attenuated but not eliminated by adjustment for baseline status. Co-morbidity adjustment is probably an important design element in clinical research focused on functional outcomes in older adults.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rigler et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002136581c6e761e77a5f0https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr515oa
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1“Mini-mental state”1975 · 87,447 citations
  2. 2A Short Physical Performance Battery Assessing Lower Extremity Function: Association With Self-Reported Disability and Prediction of Mortality and Nursing Home Admission1994 · 9,904 citations
  3. 3Accuracy of Recall of Hip Fracture, Heart Attack, and Cancer: A Comparison of Postal Survey Data and Medical Records1993 · 142 citations
  4. 4The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.1992 · 34,020 citations
  5. 5A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation1987 · 50,535 citations