Key result
Residual reference stenosis and stent underexpansion are linked to stent thrombosis after SES implantation.
Why the study?
Predictors of stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation were not well defined despite reports of cases in real-world use.
Are stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis predictors of stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation?
Case-Control (n=60)
Are stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis predictors of stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation?
Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are significant independent predictors of stent thrombosis following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the predictors of stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. BACKGROUND: A number of cases of stent thrombosis have been reported after commercial release of the SES in the "real world," such that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a warning. METHODS: Fifteen patients who developed stent thrombosis after successful SES implantation were analyzed and compared with 45 matched control patients who had no evidence of stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Minimum stent cross-sectional area (MSA) (4.3 +/- 1.6 mm(2) vs. 6.2 +/- 1.9 mm(2), p < 0.001) and stent expansion (0.65 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.14, p < 0.001) were significantly smaller in the stent thrombosis group than in the matched control patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of SES malapposition between the groups. However, the presence of a significant residual reference segment stenosis was more common in the stent thrombosis group compared with the matched control group (67% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Independent predictors of stent thrombosis were stent underexpansion (p = 0.03) and a significant residual reference segment stenosis (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are associated with stent thrombosis after successful SES implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujii et al. (2005) conducted a case-control in Stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation (n=60). Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis vs. Matched controls without stent thrombosis was evaluated on Presence of significant residual reference segment stenosis (p=<0.001). Significant residual reference segment stenosis (67% vs. 9%, p<0.001) and stent underexpansion were independent predictors of stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: